Troubling Tweets

I just got another call about a potentially “troubling tweet.”  A Troubling Tweet is a potentially damaging post using Twitter (www.twitter.com) that could get the person posting the “Tweet” in legal trouble. Most of the time, these things happen relative to damaging personal or business reputation, trademark issues, contract issues, and some other causes of action.

This is the second separate matter regarding Twitter Tweets that I’ve dealt with in the last two weeks and when that happens, I know it’s going to escalate.

Watch for an article on this topic coming out in the 12/19 issue of the Northern Colorado Business Report.  I’ll post the article to this site on that day as well.

When in doubt, don’t post and play nice.  🙂

Northern Colorado Business Report – Column 2

NCBR ARTICLE

When it’s time to turn the car around
By Kevin E. Houchin, Esq.

September 26, 2008 —
Imagine this. You’re two years into owning part of a startup. You’ve invested dozens of hours with your co-founders planning. You’ve invested dozens of nights and weekends away from your family fueling growth. Now things are rolling and it’s obviously time to take things to the next level.

Unfortunately, some of your partners don’t agree. Tension is high. Tempers are flaring. As you’re driving home from another 14-hour day, you wonder what it would cost to just keep on driving.

Can you afford to say, “It’s been good, but I’m leaving to pursue success on my own terms”?

We’ve all asked the question, “What will it cost to leave?” We asked it in our very first job, and we should keep asking in every position we ever hold. Asking the question shows we are still willing and able to grow.

The key to our successful growth is being able to accurately answer the question, but many business owners fail to plan for this eventuality. There will always come a day when you really want to just keep driving and never go back. What will that cost?

Answering this question may be the most important element of business planning. It takes work to write a solid business plan with all the conventional elements of market, management and financial forecasting, but those discussions are relatively easy compared to “What will it cost to keep driving?”

Discussing what happens when someone wants out is charged with emotion, including the fear of failure that nobody wants to bring to the planning table. Avoiding the question can cost huge money when the relationship is strained, so you need to have a plan in the event someone wants out before the multi-million dollar liquidity event materializes.

So, how do you agree on that plan? I’ve helped many startup teams work through the process in three easy steps.




Step 1: Framing the discussion positively

Nobody likes discussing bad scenarios. Fortunately, many good scenarios can frame discussions about what happens if someone wants out. What if someone gets an opportunity to spend two years surfing in New Zealand? What if someone decides to retire early? What if someone gets a chance to move on to a different startup? All these are wonderfully non-threatening stories that you can use to frame your discussion.

Once you’re talking about someone leaving for a reason you all can understand (or even envy), then discussions will go more smoothly, because we can all put ourselves in the position of wanting to move on for something better. At that point we all understand how the other people feel – without anxiety, fear, or blame.




Step 2: Incentive to turn the car around

Now that the topic is framed in a non-threatening, happy story, it’s time to get down to details. Most of the time you have gone into business with other people because they add something to the mix, and losing that person would mean losing a key element of the company’s success plan.

So, you want to give people a good reason to stay. You want to give everyone incentive to turn the car around and come back to work the next day and to work out any differences. That means you’ll want to give a fair, but relatively low, valuation for ownership interest, and you’ll want the company to have the option to pay in one lump sum, or over time.

Valuation of the company is the key. As an owner, you’ll know the financial situation. As a ticked-off owner, you’ll overvalue your contribution to the success of the venture. Without a previously established valuation, or formula to establish valuation, you can’t accurately answer what it will cost to keep driving, and you will very probably underestimate the cost and overestimate the benefit of leaving.

If you decide to go, you and the other owners of the company will likely spend thousands of dollars, maybe even tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, in legal and accounting fees trying to figure out what your share is worth. That’s incredibly wasteful and easily avoided.

There are numerous ways to value the company, and it’s important to understand that there is no “right” way. The most important thing is that all the owners agree in writing to whatever valuation approach you’ll use.

With brand new startups, I like to use the book value of the company because it’s easy to calculate, objectively measured, fair, and it undervalues each founder’s contribution to the company equally by not accounting for any “goodwill.”

In a new startup, goodwill hasn’t really been established, so the undervaluation acts as an incentive to turn the car around, because if you kept driving you would be leaving what feels like a lot of value on the table. This left-behind value acts as a great incentive to keep key partners in the company instead of taking that surfing sabbatical in New Zealand.

You’ll want to examine the valuation method every year, and after a few years consider adding some amount of goodwill into the formula, but keep it very conservative. Finally, note that if someone is pushing for higher valuation, they just might be thinking of jumping ship.

The second element of this arrangement is giving the company and other owners the option to make the payout in a payment, or over time. Obviously, if someone wants out, it’s best to get them out as cleanly and quickly as possible. Sometimes there isn’t enough cash available from the company or other owners to make a quick buyout, and the buyout has to be completed over time.

I advise giving the company and owners the option to pay 20 percent of the buyout initially, then 20 percent each year over the subsequent four years with a reasonable rate of interest.

This combination of low valuation and extended payment timeline is another powerful incentive to keep essential people in the company.




Step 3: Clear documentation

Just as a good business plan needs to be documented, so does your “what’s it going to cost me” agreement, otherwise known as a “buy-sell” or shareholder agreement. Every owner needs to sign off on the same deal.

When you work with your attorney to craft this document, you will also take into consideration what happens if someone is hurt and can’t work, gets divorced, dies, or does something that requires someone to be expelled from the ownership group. Usually, these factors can be discussed quickly and any uncomfortable feelings these topics generate can be blamed on the lawyer, because you’ll all have agreed to valuation and payout options.

Business planning is a lot of fun. Building a company is a lot of fun. Working with your friends is a lot of fun. Succeed, but plan on the day (and I guarantee it will come) when one of you asks, “What will it cost me to keep driving?” Have an answer ready.

Kevin Houchin is an attorney specializing in business development, intellectual property and marketing for entrepreneurs based in Fort Collins. He will be covering the legal world for the Business Report each quarter, and can be reached at kevin.houchin@houchinlaw.com.



Advent and Christmas – Spiritcurve.com Re-Post

It’s that time of year…  So, I thought I’d re-post this essay from back in December of 2005: “On Advent and Christmas” from my SPIRITCURVE.COM blog. Obviously, it’s not a business or legal subject, but it’ll get you thinking and maybe make the season a little more meaningful. Comments are welcome.  🙂

December, 2005: On Advent and Christmas

I was at church on the second Sunday of Advent this season and the pastor spoke about the child of light coming to the earth. I thought that discussion was very enlightened for any Christian church today. He used a story about some high-school kids on a retreat camping in the mountains and noticing how bright the stars looked. Their retreat leader changed their perspective by stating, “the stars aren’t so bright – it’s the world that’s very dark.” He went on to say that it is our role as Christians to reflect the light of Christ into the darkness of the world around us. This got me thinking.

I thought first about the whole idea of pinpoints of light in the darkness. Most of those points of light are actually VERY powerful, blazing stars in the vast darkness of space. I thought maybe the Pastor’s thought about our duty to reflect the light of Christ into the darkness of the world may have missed the mark a bit. Instead of reflecting the light of Jesus Christ, maybe our role is to BE a light in the darkness – like Christ. After all, isn’t the point Jesus was trying to make simply that there is a Christ in each of us waiting to be found and brought back to God’s light? Christ in you. Christ in me.

It’s easy to see why the reflection idea is important, after all, the brightest lights in our Earthly darkness are the moon and the planets in our solar system that actually DO simply reflect the light of the Sun. Some of the brightest people around us seem to reflect the light of the Son. But are the people who simply reflect the light of Jesus more powerful than those individual sources of light that happen to be farther away, but bring a light of their own to far larger volumes of darkness? I don’t know the answer, or if one answer exists. Maybe at times we are called to be sources of light in the vast darkness, and at sometimes we are called to reflect a relatively brighter light for the path of a relative few closest to us who are wandering in the darkness. Maybe we need to be doing both at all times.

The Christmas service was themed around the light of God becoming man. The original celebration was on the winter solstice, when light physically returns to warm the Earth in the form of longer days. The Christmas liturgy makes far more sense when examined in this context. This time our new Senior Pastor was giving the message, and correctly themed his message as one of Christmas being a time to remember that the light of divinity descended into human-kind. Predictably, but no less disappointingly, the orthodox Christian interpretation of this idea – that the divinity descended into that one baby – Jesus of Nazareth – and no other human was the substance of his message. I believe this misses the actual message of Jesus Christ, which is unsurprising, because most of his messages were misunderstood by even his closest companions. I believe that his message was that divinity descended into him, as it has into ALL humans – he was different from most in that he was able to tap and appreciate his divinity to help others, while most of us simply don’t recognize our personal spark of “Christos.”

What if Christmas was understood? What if Christmas was a reminder of the divinity in each human instead of a story of God’s divinity descending ONLY to one man who lived for around 33 years over 2,000 years ago and hasn’t been back since? How much better would our world be if each of us were accountable for the spark of divinity God gave us?

I think the world would be a far better place if each of us recognized this responsibility – it might even be a Heaven on Earth.