Copyright Ownership and Transfer

Ownership vests in the creator unless transferred in writing.

I’ve been involved in several discussions just during the last week concerning who owns the copyright of a piece of creative work. The discussions have taken place primarily in the context of graphic design of a brochure, so we’ll go with that, but the concepts transfer easily to other commissioned work.

First, ownership vests with the creator of the work at the instant the design becomes a “tangible” expression of the idea (digital files are “tangible” for this purpose). In the case of a graphic design, then the designer owns the copyright UNLESS:

1. The work was created by an employee in the scope of the job, thus the designer on staff at the design studio does not own the work, the design STUDIO (the designer’s employer) owns the work. It’s a bit confusing in the employment situation because legally the employer CREATED the work rather than the employee, so the employer does not need a separate writing for each piece of work created by an employee. Just think of the paperwork! The only exception to this is that tenured university professors own the copyright on their articles – even if created “on the clock” as part of their job. I guess it helps to have a former professor as judge when you’re a professor litigating to retain ownership of your articles!

2. The work was created as part of a “work for hire” contract (where those words or words that mean the same thing) are used in the written contract. Note, there can be no effective “work for hire” oral contract – because copyright only transfers via a writing.

So, if you’ve contracted with an independant creative person to do some work for you, that person owns the copyright on the work (even after you’ve paid) unless they have specifically transfered the copyright to you in writing. The copyright and the physical work are “separable” – thus something like a painting or a sculpture can be sold and resold, with the copyright always remaining with the artist by default unless transferred in writing or created within the scope of full-time employment.

Copyright Presentation

Copyright Basics Presentation Sunday, March 12th.

I’ll be giving another copyright basics presentation (as part of Colorado Lawyers for the Arts) this Sunday, March 12th at 1:30pm.

This is scheduled as a meeting for a botanical artist group, but I’m betting others will be welcomed for some small fee at the door to cover refreshments, etc. Email me if you would like me to see if it’s OK for you to attend.

Details:
College Hill Library, Room L-107 (lower level) 3705 W. 112th Ave. in Westminster, Colorado.

Directions:
from I25, go west on 104th to Federal,
turn right (north) on Federal and proceed to 112th.
Turn left (west) on 112th.

The Library is on the right about 1 mile farther, next to
Front Range Community College. Park on the lower level.

Building Creative Businesses Expo

I’m speaking at this Expo tomorrow…

I’m speaking on creative business development tomorrow at the “Building Creative Businesses Expo“. Here’s the handout I’ll be using. (PDF)

Building Creative Businesses Expo
SAVE THE DATE!
Building Creative Businesses Expo
Saturday, March 4, 2006
10:00am – 4:00pm

FREE!

Wellington E. Webb Municipal Building
210 W. Colfax
Denver, CO 80202

Special note: Room capacity for workshops is limited; interested participants may register for up to three (3) workshops on the day of the event, Saturday, March 4 beginning at 9:30am. Please visit the Workshop Registration portion of this site for details.

(c) and Big Money

Dan Brown is getting sued for allegedly plagiarizing the book The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail in the content of The DaVinci Code.

I’ve read both. The plaintiffs don’t have a very strong case – ideas are not copyrightable, and that’s about the only thing that is similar.

This strikes of lesser-selling authors with an jealousy complex – suing in hope of grabbing some fast cash in a nuisance settlement. When the defendant decided to fight things backfired. Brown is going to win, and his publishers will probably get their attorney fees paid for by the plaintiffs – a BIG backfire indeed…

Here’s a link to the story